Rated 3.98/5 based on 561 customer reviews

We will now look at several arguments, which may or may not be supported by Dr. I will also present a couple of arguments indicating that the earth is much older than a few thousand years.

Former creationist Glenn Morton examines several famous young-earth creationist arguments and provides data to illustrate their flaws.

But even schoolboys need to know what the right answers are in order to cheat, and there was no absolute age list when radiometric dating was first applied to the strata.

Anyone can make up a list of bad cars, bad people, bad neighborhoods, or bad radiometric dates. Is it unsafe for you to drive a car, to meet new people, or to live in a neighborhood? The thing that is lacking in Woodmorappe's argument is statistical balance.

The value of is going to depend on our preferred choice of definition for what we mean by that statement, and our intuition about what means for positive values is not enough to conclude what it means for zero values.

But if this is the case, then how can mathematicians claim that ? Some very important formulas become less elegant to write down if we instead use or if we say that is undefined.

In particular, when we approach (0,0) along the line with x=0 we get but when we approach (0,0) along the line segment with y=0 and x Mathematician: Zero raised to the zero power is one. For example, one idea is to use for our definition: := where the y is repeated x times. In words, that means that the value of is whatever approaches as the real number z gets smaller and smaller approaching the value x arbitrarily closely.    Thus, we clear away the first illusion spun by creationism, namely that most of the dates are bad, that the radiometric picture is totally chaotic.For example, consider the binomial theorem, which says that: = where means the binomial coefficients.Now, setting a=0 on both sides and assuming we get = = = = = where, I’ve used that for k0, and that .Cleverest student : That doesn’t work either, because if then is so your third step also involves dividing by zero which isn’t allowed! Hence, That is, as x gets arbitrarily close to (but remains positive), stays at .Instead, we can think about the function and see what happens as x High School Teacher: Showing that approaches 1 as the positive value x gets arbitrarily close to zero does not prove that . On the other hand, for real numbers y such that , we have that .